| Science home | Future students | Current students | Postgraduate | Research | Staff | Contact us |
| Staff directory | A-Z index | Site map |
Does adding riffles to urban streams increase biological diversity?An experimental assessment (part of CRCFE project E301: Biological Assessment and Management of Urban streams, later project B705: Experimental assessment of physical habitat in urban streams: limitations to recruitment)
Up to five years after the riffle addition, there was little change in community composition in the test sites. Sensitive taxa, such as mayflies and caddisflies were collected at least once in all new riffles (not at all before and not at all in control streams), but none persisted beyond a single sample period. This suggests that the riffles did provide enhanced habitat for colonization, and that lack of available recruits was not a limiting factor in colonization of the riffles. It is hypothesized that these sensitive taxa were unable to persist in these streams because of water quality (or hydraulic) disturbances associated with urban stormwater. This hypothesis is consistent with associated work, which pointed to catchment-scale factors associated with urban stormwater being the environmental factors that best explained patterns of community composition. Macroinvertebrate communities of most sites in the Melbourne metropolitan area are severely degraded, even at very low levels of total catchment urbanization, probably because of impacts associated with the efficient stormwater drainage system of the metropolitan area. Project teamChris Walsh, Leader Further reading
|
|